Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- parawing [2007/03/08 19:40] – jcoxon
+++ parawing [2008/07/19 23:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Things that need to be done/overcome/worked out:
   * 2 way comms
   * kite dynamics, e.g. winds, angle of attach
   * deployment at altitude e.g. cutdown, drogue? predeployment? parachute for most of descent and then use parawing later?
   * pathfinding - ability to calculate best angle of attack into the wind, not risk parawing by going directly into the wind, find alternative landing sites?
   * kite shape - enchanced or not?
   * control, method of turning, servos + bar, motor + drive shaft + t bar, winch + bridle
   * flight computer - gumstix for gps, digital compass, complex pathfinding, comms + PIC for controlling motors/servos + sensors?
   * landing - autopilot? r/c guided?
   * future plans/roadmap
 Specs:
@@ Line 22: / Line 23: @@
   * equivalent parawing?
-Links:
+- Feedback from MC:  If you want to split up tasks, I could work on 2 way comms.
-  *
+Parawing won't mind going into wind, IMHO
+I think the Mk1 version could be steered from the ground, then Mk2 could be steered by software
+It should be possible to have a much smaller payload, perhaps around the mass of a servo+batt+electronics, 200g?
+ed: - Although reduced weight is a good thing in general, weight will help us control the wing. Also, when you factor in cameras and the actual mechanics, 750g seems like a more realistic target to me- we'll still have to be building light to get it in under that!
+Ideas:
+  * [[http://www.pegasushabproject.org.uk/parawing/STEER.gif|Parawing Steering 1]]
+[[[projects::parafoil::Links]]